Uzbekistan vs Western Africa: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Uzbekistan
- Western Africa
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 50.32 kg/ha against 16.74 kg/ha in Western Africa, a difference of 33.58 kg/ha.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 3.0 times Western Africa's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Uzbekistan ranks 22nd and Western Africa ranks 21st of 186 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uzbekistan | Western Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31.02 kg/ha | 10.56 kg/ha | 20.46 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 33.84 kg/ha | 12.32 kg/ha | 21.52 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 42.34 kg/ha | 14.36 kg/ha | 27.98 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 47.42 kg/ha | 16.51 kg/ha | 30.91 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Uzbekistan or Western Africa?
- Uzbekistan, at 50.32 kg/ha against 16.74 kg/ha in Western Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Uzbekistan and Western Africa?
- 33.58 kg/ha, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uzbekistan and Western Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Uzbekistan and Western Africa rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Uzbekistan ranks 22nd and Western Africa ranks 21st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).