Afghanistan vs Burundi: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Afghanistan
- Burundi
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 49,465 t against 48,638 t in Burundi, a difference of 827 t.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 91st and Burundi ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 3 and Burundi in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Burundi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24,552 t | 19,562 t | 4,990 t | Afghanistan |
| 1970s | 29,127 t | 21,496 t | 7,631 t | Afghanistan |
| 1980s | 23,976 t | 24,795 t | 819 t | Burundi |
| 1990s | 24,192 t | 28,166 t | 3,973 t | Burundi |
| 2000s | 29,886 t | 30,547 t | 661.37 t | Burundi |
| 2010s | 41,433 t | 33,729 t | 7,705 t | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 48,289 t | 48,695 t | 406 t | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Afghanistan or Burundi?
- Afghanistan, at 49,465 t against 48,638 t in Burundi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Afghanistan and Burundi?
- 827 t, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Burundi?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Burundi rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Afghanistan ranks 91st and Burundi ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).