Afghanistan vs Costa Rica: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Afghanistan
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 50,959 t against 49,465 t in Afghanistan, a difference of 1,494 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 79th and Costa Rica ranks 78th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 3 and Costa Rica in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24,552 t | 10,612 t | 13,940 t | Afghanistan |
| 1970s | 29,127 t | 18,066 t | 11,061 t | Afghanistan |
| 1980s | 23,976 t | 21,111 t | 2,865 t | Afghanistan |
| 1990s | 24,192 t | 35,235 t | 11,043 t | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 29,886 t | 38,820 t | 8,934 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 41,433 t | 51,470 t | 10,037 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 48,289 t | 51,127 t | 2,838 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Afghanistan or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 50,959 t against 49,465 t in Afghanistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Afghanistan and Costa Rica?
- 1,494 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Costa Rica?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Costa Rica rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Afghanistan ranks 79th and Costa Rica ranks 78th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).