Africa vs Russian Federation: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Africa
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Africa currently reports 4.89 million t against 1.35 million t in Russian Federation, a difference of 3.54 million t.
That makes Africa's figure about 3.6 times Russian Federation's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Africa has been ahead every year.
Africa ranks 10th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 32 groups.
Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.18 million t | 724,436 t | 1.45 million t | Africa |
| 2000s | 2.84 million t | 756,431 t | 2.08 million t | Africa |
| 2010s | 3.95 million t | 1.01 million t | 2.95 million t | Africa |
| 2020s | 4.78 million t | 1.27 million t | 3.50 million t | Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Africa or Russian Federation?
- Africa, at 4.89 million t against 1.35 million t in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Africa and Russian Federation?
- 3.54 million t, with Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Africa and Russian Federation rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Africa ranks 10th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).