Armenia vs Gabon: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Armenia
- Gabon
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 7,792 t against 7,562 t in Armenia, a difference of 230 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 139th and Gabon ranks 138th of 201 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Gabon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5,890 t | 3,336 t | 2,555 t | Armenia |
| 2000s | 7,854 t | 3,980 t | 3,873 t | Armenia |
| 2010s | 9,990 t | 5,375 t | 4,615 t | Armenia |
| 2020s | 7,398 t | 7,166 t | 231.52 t | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Armenia or Gabon?
- Gabon, at 7,792 t against 7,562 t in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Armenia and Gabon?
- 230 t, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Gabon?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Gabon rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Armenia ranks 139th and Gabon ranks 138th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).