Australia and New Zealand vs Ukraine: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 669,062 t against 634,016 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 35,046 t.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ukraine ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th and Ukraine ranks 10th of 186 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 294,157 t | 400,528 t | 106,370 t | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 327,208 t | 421,018 t | 93,810 t | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 403,366 t | 639,910 t | 236,544 t | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 501,896 t | 669,197 t | 167,302 t | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Australia and New Zealand or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 669,062 t against 634,016 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Australia and New Zealand and Ukraine?
- 35,046 t, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Ukraine rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th and Ukraine ranks 10th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).