Australia vs Polynesia: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Australia
- Polynesia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 617,777 t against 2,660 t in Polynesia, a difference of 615,117 t.
That makes Australia's figure about 232.3 times Polynesia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 14th and Polynesia ranks 17th of 186 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 97,715 t | 4,754 t | 92,961 t | Australia |
| 1970s | 133,281 t | 4,830 t | 128,452 t | Australia |
| 1980s | 193,274 t | 4,327 t | 188,947 t | Australia |
| 1990s | 267,627 t | 3,122 t | 264,505 t | Australia |
| 2000s | 312,133 t | 3,310 t | 308,823 t | Australia |
| 2010s | 387,047 t | 3,128 t | 383,919 t | Australia |
| 2020s | 485,367 t | 2,651 t | 482,716 t | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Australia or Polynesia?
- Australia, at 617,777 t against 2,660 t in Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Australia and Polynesia?
- 615,117 t, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Polynesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Polynesia rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Australia ranks 14th and Polynesia ranks 17th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).