Barbados vs Cabo Verde: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Barbados
- Cabo Verde
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 310.17 t against 211.5 t in Barbados, a difference of 98.67 t.
That makes Cabo Verde's figure about 1.5 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 183rd and Cabo Verde ranks 182nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 5 and Cabo Verde in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Cabo Verde | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,314 t | 349.12 t | 1,965 t | Barbados |
| 1970s | 1,593 t | 196.03 t | 1,397 t | Barbados |
| 1980s | 1,242 t | 336.81 t | 905.36 t | Barbados |
| 1990s | 809.86 t | 315.06 t | 494.8 t | Barbados |
| 2000s | 639.25 t | 471.03 t | 168.23 t | Barbados |
| 2010s | 328.94 t | 463.08 t | 134.14 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2020s | 227.15 t | 334.3 t | 107.15 t | Cabo Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Barbados or Cabo Verde?
- Cabo Verde, at 310.17 t against 211.5 t in Barbados as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Barbados and Cabo Verde?
- 98.67 t, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Cabo Verde?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Cabo Verde rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Barbados ranks 183rd and Cabo Verde ranks 182nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).