Belarus vs Morocco: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Belarus
- Morocco
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 93,432 t against 93,113 t in Morocco, a difference of 319 t.
The two have swapped places 20 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 61st and Morocco ranks 62nd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Morocco in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 92,477 t | 72,059 t | 20,418 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 102,140 t | 86,038 t | 16,102 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 102,389 t | 113,384 t | 10,995 t | Morocco |
| 2020s | 91,398 t | 103,034 t | 11,636 t | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Belarus or Morocco?
- Belarus, at 93,432 t against 93,113 t in Morocco as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Belarus and Morocco?
- 319 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Morocco?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Morocco rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Belarus ranks 61st and Morocco ranks 62nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).