Belgium vs Sri Lanka: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Belgium
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 65,741 t against 63,389 t in Belgium, a difference of 2,352 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 69th and Sri Lanka ranks 66th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72,294 t | 52,382 t | 19,912 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 67,286 t | 65,743 t | 1,544 t | Belgium |
| 2020s | 61,871 t | 70,391 t | 8,519 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Belgium or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 65,741 t against 63,389 t in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Belgium and Sri Lanka?
- 2,352 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sri Lanka?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Sri Lanka rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Belgium ranks 69th and Sri Lanka ranks 66th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).