Benin vs Czechia: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Benin
- Czechia
How they compare
Benin currently reports 79,881 t against 69,889 t in Czechia, a difference of 9,992 t.
That makes Benin's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Benin ranks 69th and Czechia ranks 71st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 1 and Czechia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 28,474 t | 66,759 t | 38,286 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 36,915 t | 63,789 t | 26,875 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 56,114 t | 67,407 t | 11,293 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 75,980 t | 70,438 t | 5,541 t | Benin |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Benin or Czechia?
- Benin, at 79,881 t against 69,889 t in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Benin and Czechia?
- 9,992 t, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Czechia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Benin and Czechia rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Benin ranks 69th and Czechia ranks 71st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).