Bhutan vs Kiribati: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Bhutan
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 1,216 t against 1,157 t in Bhutan, a difference of 59 t.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 154th and Kiribati ranks 152nd of 186 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 733.35 t | 414.74 t | 318.61 t | Bhutan |
| 1970s | 928.46 t | 452.05 t | 476.41 t | Bhutan |
| 1980s | 1,221 t | 622.09 t | 598.59 t | Bhutan |
| 1990s | 1,311 t | 581.99 t | 729.4 t | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 1,547 t | 839.36 t | 707.93 t | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 1,741 t | 1,193 t | 547.64 t | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 1,364 t | 1,159 t | 205.44 t | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Bhutan or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 1,216 t against 1,157 t in Bhutan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Bhutan and Kiribati?
- 59 t, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Kiribati?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Kiribati rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Bhutan ranks 154th and Kiribati ranks 152nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).