Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Libya: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Libya
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 13,261 t against 9,671 t in Libya, a difference of 3,590 t.
That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.4 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and Libya ranks 120th of 186 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,852 t | 7,665 t | 2,186 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 11,241 t | 8,292 t | 2,949 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 11,911 t | 9,718 t | 2,193 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 14,191 t | 9,617 t | 4,574 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Libya?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 13,261 t against 9,671 t in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Libya?
- 3,590 t, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Libya?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Libya rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and Libya ranks 120th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).