Botswana vs Luxembourg: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Botswana
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 1,050 t against 916.28 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 133.72 t.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Botswana ranks 168th and Luxembourg ranks 170th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 633.8 t | 1,155 t | 520.74 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 798.35 t | 1,041 t | 242.94 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 1,317 t | 947.04 t | 370.12 t | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Botswana or Luxembourg?
- Botswana, at 1,050 t against 916.28 t in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Botswana and Luxembourg?
- 133.72 t, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Luxembourg rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Botswana ranks 168th and Luxembourg ranks 170th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).