Brazil vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Outputs — Cropland potassium

Brazil
5.18 million t
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
3.87 million t
in 2023
Brazil rank
4th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
12th

Outputs — Cropland potassium over time

  • Brazil
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 5.18 million t against 3.87 million t in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 1.31 million t.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.3 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.

Brazil ranks 4th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 12th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 468,873 t 960,742 t 491,869 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1970s 704,340 t 1.24 million t 539,886 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1980s 1.17 million t 1.46 million t 293,474 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 1.53 million t 1.71 million t 183,061 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 2.50 million t 2.23 million t 267,975 t Brazil
2010s 3.79 million t 3.14 million t 652,336 t Brazil
2020s 4.67 million t 3.76 million t 904,298 t Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Brazil or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Brazil, at 5.18 million t against 3.87 million t in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Brazil and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
1.31 million t, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
Brazil ranks 4th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 12th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/outputs-cropland-potassium/brazil/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/outputs-cropland-potassium/brazil/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Brazil vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Outputs — Cropland potassium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).