Brunei Darussalam vs Iceland: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 98.12 t against 75.13 t in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 22.99 t.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.3 times Brunei Darussalam's.
The two have swapped places 18 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 193rd and Iceland ranks 192nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Brunei Darussalam averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 48.01 t | 48.35 t | 0.3359 t | Iceland |
| 1970s | 56.75 t | 50.79 t | 5.96 t | Brunei Darussalam |
| 1980s | 43.94 t | 78.17 t | 34.23 t | Iceland |
| 1990s | 45.45 t | 65.84 t | 20.39 t | Iceland |
| 2000s | 63.5 t | 74.97 t | 11.48 t | Iceland |
| 2010s | 74.49 t | 79.65 t | 5.16 t | Iceland |
| 2020s | 73.03 t | 97.75 t | 24.72 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Brunei Darussalam or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 98.12 t against 75.13 t in Brunei Darussalam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Brunei Darussalam and Iceland?
- 22.99 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Iceland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Iceland rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 193rd and Iceland ranks 192nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).