Burkina Faso vs Serbia: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Burkina Faso
- Serbia
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 83,618 t against 82,871 t in Serbia, a difference of 747 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 58th and Serbia ranks 59th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51,033 t | 71,756 t | 20,723 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 67,885 t | 76,562 t | 8,677 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 80,248 t | 79,998 t | 249.07 t | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Burkina Faso or Serbia?
- Burkina Faso, at 83,618 t against 82,871 t in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Burkina Faso and Serbia?
- 747 t, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Serbia rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Burkina Faso ranks 58th and Serbia ranks 59th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).