Burundi vs Cuba: Outputs — Cropland potassium

Burundi
48,638 t
in 2023
Cuba
45,244 t
in 2023
Burundi rank
92nd
Cuba rank
95th

Outputs — Cropland potassium over time

  • Burundi
  • Cuba
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 48,638 t against 45,244 t in Cuba, a difference of 3,394 t.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Burundi ranks 92nd and Cuba ranks 95th of 201 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Cuba Difference Ahead
1960s 19,562 t 76,272 t 56,710 t Cuba
1970s 21,496 t 99,738 t 78,242 t Cuba
1980s 24,795 t 119,605 t 94,810 t Cuba
1990s 28,166 t 89,881 t 61,715 t Cuba
2000s 30,547 t 76,270 t 45,723 t Cuba
2010s 33,729 t 75,584 t 41,855 t Cuba
2020s 48,695 t 50,000 t 1,305 t Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Burundi or Cuba?
Burundi, at 48,638 t against 45,244 t in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Burundi and Cuba?
3,394 t, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Cuba?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Cuba rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
Burundi ranks 92nd and Cuba ranks 95th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).