Cabo Verde vs Maldives: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Cabo Verde
- Maldives
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 310.17 t against 187.58 t in Maldives, a difference of 122.59 t.
That makes Cabo Verde's figure about 1.7 times Maldives's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cabo Verde ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 182nd and Maldives ranks 185th of 201 countries.
Cabo Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 349.12 t | 118.63 t | 230.49 t | Cabo Verde |
| 1970s | 196.03 t | 136.61 t | 59.43 t | Cabo Verde |
| 1980s | 336.81 t | 182 t | 154.81 t | Cabo Verde |
| 1990s | 315.06 t | 164.81 t | 150.25 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2000s | 471.03 t | 288.01 t | 183.02 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2010s | 463.08 t | 264.74 t | 198.34 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2020s | 334.3 t | 233.52 t | 100.78 t | Cabo Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Cabo Verde or Maldives?
- Cabo Verde, at 310.17 t against 187.58 t in Maldives as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Cabo Verde and Maldives?
- 122.59 t, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Maldives?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Maldives rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Cabo Verde ranks 182nd and Maldives ranks 185th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).