Cambodia vs Czechoslovakia: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Cambodia
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 100,808 t against 96,734 t in Cambodia, a difference of 4,074 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 60th and Czechoslovakia ranks 57th of 201 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 13,793 t | 99,390 t | 85,597 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 8,983 t | 106,096 t | 97,112 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 10,155 t | 113,352 t | 103,196 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 13,257 t | 108,308 t | 95,051 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Cambodia or Czechoslovakia?
- Czechoslovakia, at 100,808 t against 96,734 t in Cambodia as of 1992.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Cambodia and Czechoslovakia?
- 4,074 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Cambodia and Czechoslovakia rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Cambodia ranks 60th and Czechoslovakia ranks 57th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).