Cambodia vs Sudan: Outputs — Cropland potassium

Cambodia
96,734 t
in 2023
Sudan
98,665 t
in 2023
Cambodia rank
60th
Sudan rank
59th

Outputs — Cropland potassium over time

  • Cambodia
  • Sudan
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 98,665 t against 96,734 t in Cambodia, a difference of 1,931 t.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.

Cambodia ranks 60th and Sudan ranks 59th of 201 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 76,258 t 98,551 t 22,292 t Sudan
2020s 91,335 t 113,169 t 21,834 t Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Cambodia or Sudan?
Sudan, at 98,665 t against 96,734 t in Cambodia as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Cambodia and Sudan?
1,931 t, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Sudan rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
Cambodia ranks 60th and Sudan ranks 59th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).