Caribbean vs Philippines: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Caribbean
- Philippines
How they compare
Caribbean currently reports 354,830 t against 353,320 t in Philippines, a difference of 1,510 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Caribbean ahead.
Caribbean ranks 23rd and Philippines ranks 24th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Caribbean averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 155,765 t | 123,266 t | 32,498 t | Caribbean |
| 1970s | 177,540 t | 178,419 t | 879 t | Philippines |
| 1980s | 192,547 t | 213,766 t | 21,219 t | Philippines |
| 1990s | 163,990 t | 246,636 t | 82,646 t | Philippines |
| 2000s | 194,133 t | 307,093 t | 112,960 t | Philippines |
| 2010s | 255,324 t | 353,478 t | 98,154 t | Philippines |
| 2020s | 311,045 t | 356,338 t | 45,293 t | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Caribbean or Philippines?
- Caribbean, at 354,830 t against 353,320 t in Philippines as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Caribbean and Philippines?
- 1,510 t, with Caribbean ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Philippines?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Philippines rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Caribbean ranks 23rd and Philippines ranks 24th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).