Caribbean vs Poland: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Caribbean
- Poland
How they compare
Caribbean currently reports 354,830 t against 329,474 t in Poland, a difference of 25,356 t.
That makes Caribbean's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.
Caribbean ranks 23rd and Poland ranks 26th of 201 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 155,765 t | 407,978 t | 252,213 t | Poland |
| 1970s | 177,540 t | 449,680 t | 272,141 t | Poland |
| 1980s | 192,547 t | 406,828 t | 214,281 t | Poland |
| 1990s | 163,990 t | 363,100 t | 199,110 t | Poland |
| 2000s | 194,133 t | 290,539 t | 96,406 t | Poland |
| 2010s | 255,324 t | 284,546 t | 29,221 t | Poland |
| 2020s | 311,045 t | 324,758 t | 13,713 t | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Caribbean or Poland?
- Caribbean, at 354,830 t against 329,474 t in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Caribbean and Poland?
- 25,356 t, with Caribbean ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Poland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Poland rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Caribbean ranks 23rd and Poland ranks 26th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).