Caribbean vs Viet Nam: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Caribbean
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 405,095 t against 354,830 t in Caribbean, a difference of 50,265 t.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.1 times Caribbean's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Caribbean ahead.
Caribbean ranks 23rd and Viet Nam ranks 21st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Caribbean averaged higher in 3 and Viet Nam in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 155,765 t | 56,603 t | 99,161 t | Caribbean |
| 1970s | 177,540 t | 70,368 t | 107,172 t | Caribbean |
| 1980s | 192,547 t | 112,759 t | 79,788 t | Caribbean |
| 1990s | 163,990 t | 169,027 t | 5,037 t | Viet Nam |
| 2000s | 194,133 t | 266,982 t | 72,849 t | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 255,324 t | 363,015 t | 107,690 t | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 311,045 t | 396,164 t | 85,119 t | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Caribbean or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 405,095 t against 354,830 t in Caribbean as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Caribbean and Viet Nam?
- 50,265 t, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Viet Nam?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Viet Nam rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Caribbean ranks 23rd and Viet Nam ranks 21st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).