Central Asia vs Ethiopia: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Central Asia
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 481,592 t against 269,982 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 211,610 t.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 1.8 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Central Asia has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 27th and Ethiopia ranks 28th of 32 groups.
Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 308,861 t | 69,582 t | 239,279 t | Central Asia |
| 2000s | 364,808 t | 112,922 t | 251,886 t | Central Asia |
| 2010s | 443,726 t | 222,662 t | 221,064 t | Central Asia |
| 2020s | 495,616 t | 264,383 t | 231,233 t | Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Central Asia or Ethiopia?
- Central Asia, at 481,592 t against 269,982 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Central Asia and Ethiopia?
- 211,610 t, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia and Ethiopia rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Central Asia ranks 27th and Ethiopia ranks 28th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).