Chile vs Zambia: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Chile
- Zambia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 57,761 t against 57,302 t in Zambia, a difference of 459 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 84th and Zambia ranks 85th of 201 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 25,261 t | 5,401 t | 19,860 t | Chile |
| 1970s | 29,045 t | 8,683 t | 20,363 t | Chile |
| 1980s | 37,925 t | 10,395 t | 27,530 t | Chile |
| 1990s | 53,222 t | 12,909 t | 40,312 t | Chile |
| 2000s | 59,984 t | 19,932 t | 40,052 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 67,180 t | 38,650 t | 28,530 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 60,397 t | 49,160 t | 11,237 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Chile or Zambia?
- Chile, at 57,761 t against 57,302 t in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Chile and Zambia?
- 459 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zambia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Zambia rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Chile ranks 84th and Zambia ranks 85th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).