China, Taiwan Province of vs Cuba: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- China, Taiwan Province of
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 45,244 t against 43,217 t in China, Taiwan Province of, a difference of 2,027 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
China, Taiwan Province of ranks 84th and Cuba ranks 83rd of 186 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Taiwan Province of | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 57,130 t | 76,272 t | 19,142 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 60,243 t | 99,738 t | 39,495 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 54,255 t | 119,605 t | 65,350 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 54,574 t | 89,881 t | 35,307 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 45,824 t | 76,270 t | 30,446 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 45,230 t | 75,584 t | 30,354 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 44,540 t | 50,000 t | 5,460 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, China, Taiwan Province of or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 45,244 t against 43,217 t in China, Taiwan Province of as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between China, Taiwan Province of and Cuba?
- 2,027 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Taiwan Province of and Cuba?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do China, Taiwan Province of and Cuba rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- China, Taiwan Province of ranks 84th and Cuba ranks 83rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).