Cook Islands vs Iceland: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Cook Islands
- Iceland
How they compare
Cook Islands currently reports 103.49 t against 98.12 t in Iceland, a difference of 5.37 t.
That makes Cook Islands's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cook Islands ahead.
Cook Islands ranks 191st and Iceland ranks 192nd of 201 countries.
Cook Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 152.98 t | 48.35 t | 104.63 t | Cook Islands |
| 1970s | 162.89 t | 50.79 t | 112.1 t | Cook Islands |
| 1980s | 206.07 t | 78.17 t | 127.9 t | Cook Islands |
| 1990s | 264.08 t | 65.84 t | 198.24 t | Cook Islands |
| 2000s | 154.74 t | 74.97 t | 79.77 t | Cook Islands |
| 2010s | 106.86 t | 79.65 t | 27.21 t | Cook Islands |
| 2020s | 103.54 t | 97.75 t | 5.79 t | Cook Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Cook Islands or Iceland?
- Cook Islands, at 103.49 t against 98.12 t in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Cook Islands and Iceland?
- 5.37 t, with Cook Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Iceland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cook Islands and Iceland rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Cook Islands ranks 191st and Iceland ranks 192nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).