Costa Rica vs Madagascar: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Costa Rica
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 53,104 t against 50,959 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 2,145 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 90th and Madagascar ranks 87th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Madagascar in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,612 t | 19,174 t | 8,562 t | Madagascar |
| 1970s | 18,066 t | 24,571 t | 6,505 t | Madagascar |
| 1980s | 21,111 t | 29,166 t | 8,055 t | Madagascar |
| 1990s | 35,235 t | 33,055 t | 2,181 t | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 38,820 t | 39,333 t | 512.8 t | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 51,470 t | 47,889 t | 3,581 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 51,127 t | 51,168 t | 41.47 t | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Costa Rica or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 53,104 t against 50,959 t in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Costa Rica and Madagascar?
- 2,145 t, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Madagascar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Madagascar rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Costa Rica ranks 90th and Madagascar ranks 87th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).