Côte d'Ivoire vs Myanmar: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Myanmar
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 243,723 t against 243,084 t in Myanmar, a difference of 639 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Myanmar ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 30th and Myanmar ranks 31st of 201 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 25,533 t | 42,069 t | 16,536 t | Myanmar |
| 1970s | 42,033 t | 49,784 t | 7,751 t | Myanmar |
| 1980s | 68,753 t | 79,985 t | 11,232 t | Myanmar |
| 1990s | 99,260 t | 103,616 t | 4,356 t | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 125,522 t | 209,484 t | 83,962 t | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 172,661 t | 264,430 t | 91,769 t | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 233,397 t | 244,738 t | 11,341 t | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Côte d'Ivoire or Myanmar?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 243,723 t against 243,084 t in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Côte d'Ivoire and Myanmar?
- 639 t, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Myanmar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Myanmar rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 30th and Myanmar ranks 31st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).