Croatia vs Sierra Leone: Outputs — Cropland potassium

Croatia
22,969 t
in 2023
Sierra Leone
19,439 t
in 2023
Croatia rank
115th
Sierra Leone rank
118th

Outputs — Cropland potassium over time

  • Croatia
  • Sierra Leone
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 22,969 t against 19,439 t in Sierra Leone, a difference of 3,530 t.

That makes Croatia's figure about 1.2 times Sierra Leone's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 115th and Sierra Leone ranks 118th of 201 countries.

Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1990s 24,165 t 6,255 t 17,911 t Croatia
2000s 27,959 t 11,066 t 16,893 t Croatia
2010s 30,644 t 18,783 t 11,861 t Croatia
2020s 29,233 t 19,309 t 9,924 t Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Croatia or Sierra Leone?
Croatia, at 22,969 t against 19,439 t in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Croatia and Sierra Leone?
3,530 t, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Sierra Leone?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Croatia and Sierra Leone rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
Croatia ranks 115th and Sierra Leone ranks 118th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).