Czechia vs Denmark: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Czechia
- Denmark
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 69,889 t against 67,134 t in Denmark, a difference of 2,755 t.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Denmark ahead.
Czechia ranks 71st and Denmark ranks 73rd of 201 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 66,759 t | 72,796 t | 6,036 t | Denmark |
| 2000s | 63,789 t | 69,529 t | 5,740 t | Denmark |
| 2010s | 67,407 t | 71,315 t | 3,908 t | Denmark |
| 2020s | 70,438 t | 75,181 t | 4,743 t | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Czechia or Denmark?
- Czechia, at 69,889 t against 67,134 t in Denmark as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Czechia and Denmark?
- 2,755 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Denmark?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Denmark rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Czechia ranks 71st and Denmark ranks 73rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).