Czechia vs Sudan (former): Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Czechia
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 79,778 t against 69,889 t in Czechia, a difference of 9,889 t.
That makes Sudan (former)'s figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 71st and Sudan (former) ranks 70th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Sudan (former) in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 66,759 t | 57,169 t | 9,590 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 63,789 t | 74,064 t | 10,275 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 64,491 t | 72,122 t | 7,630 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Czechia or Sudan (former)?
- Sudan (former), at 79,778 t against 69,889 t in Czechia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Czechia and Sudan (former)?
- 9,889 t, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Sudan (former)?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Czechia and Sudan (former) rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Czechia ranks 71st and Sudan (former) ranks 70th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).