Czechoslovakia vs Hungary: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 100,991 t against 100,808 t in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 183 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.
Czechoslovakia ranks 57th and Hungary ranks 56th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechoslovakia averaged higher in 2 and Hungary in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 99,390 t | 73,508 t | 25,882 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 106,096 t | 92,585 t | 13,511 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 113,352 t | 116,919 t | 3,568 t | Hungary |
| 1990s | 108,308 t | 108,621 t | 312.53 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Czechoslovakia or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 100,991 t against 100,808 t in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Czechoslovakia and Hungary?
- 183 t, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Hungary?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Hungary rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 57th and Hungary ranks 56th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).