Djibouti vs Montenegro: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Djibouti
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 423.17 t against 316.39 t in Djibouti, a difference of 106.78 t.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.3 times Djibouti's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 167th and Montenegro ranks 166th of 185 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 116.33 t | 705.86 t | 589.52 t | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 182.74 t | 487.05 t | 304.31 t | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 322.57 t | 455.28 t | 132.71 t | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Djibouti or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 423.17 t against 316.39 t in Djibouti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Djibouti and Montenegro?
- 106.78 t, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Djibouti and Montenegro rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Djibouti ranks 167th and Montenegro ranks 166th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).