Dominican Republic vs Egypt: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Dominican Republic
- Egypt
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 334,624 t against 279,354 t in Dominican Republic, a difference of 55,270 t.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.2 times Dominican Republic's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 24th and Egypt ranks 22nd of 185 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 23,105 t | 97,760 t | 74,655 t | Egypt |
| 1970s | 30,378 t | 112,887 t | 82,509 t | Egypt |
| 1980s | 31,486 t | 134,257 t | 102,772 t | Egypt |
| 1990s | 35,261 t | 182,248 t | 146,987 t | Egypt |
| 2000s | 81,745 t | 243,195 t | 161,450 t | Egypt |
| 2010s | 143,310 t | 292,430 t | 149,120 t | Egypt |
| 2020s | 229,885 t | 327,956 t | 98,072 t | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Dominican Republic or Egypt?
- Egypt, at 334,624 t against 279,354 t in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Dominican Republic and Egypt?
- 55,270 t, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Egypt?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and Egypt rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Dominican Republic ranks 24th and Egypt ranks 22nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).