Egypt vs Philippines: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Egypt
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 353,320 t against 334,624 t in Egypt, a difference of 18,696 t.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 25th and Philippines ranks 24th of 201 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 97,760 t | 123,266 t | 25,506 t | Philippines |
| 1970s | 112,887 t | 178,419 t | 65,531 t | Philippines |
| 1980s | 134,257 t | 213,766 t | 79,508 t | Philippines |
| 1990s | 182,248 t | 246,636 t | 64,388 t | Philippines |
| 2000s | 243,195 t | 307,093 t | 63,898 t | Philippines |
| 2010s | 292,430 t | 353,478 t | 61,048 t | Philippines |
| 2020s | 327,956 t | 356,338 t | 28,382 t | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Egypt or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 353,320 t against 334,624 t in Egypt as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Egypt and Philippines?
- 18,696 t, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Philippines?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and Philippines rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Egypt ranks 25th and Philippines ranks 24th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).