El Salvador vs Finland: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- El Salvador
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 21,609 t against 18,887 t in El Salvador, a difference of 2,722 t.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.
El Salvador ranks 119th and Finland ranks 116th of 201 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11,629 t | 18,014 t | 6,384 t | Finland |
| 1970s | 16,975 t | 23,231 t | 6,256 t | Finland |
| 1980s | 14,707 t | 25,430 t | 10,723 t | Finland |
| 1990s | 17,468 t | 27,259 t | 9,791 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 23,528 t | 29,319 t | 5,791 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 19,567 t | 25,254 t | 5,687 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 19,302 t | 22,719 t | 3,416 t | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, El Salvador or Finland?
- Finland, at 21,609 t against 18,887 t in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between El Salvador and Finland?
- 2,722 t, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Finland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Finland rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- El Salvador ranks 119th and Finland ranks 116th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).