Eritrea vs Namibia: Outputs — Cropland potassium

Eritrea
2,730 t
in 2023
Namibia
2,497 t
in 2023
Eritrea rank
155th
Namibia rank
157th

Outputs — Cropland potassium over time

  • Eritrea
  • Namibia
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 2,730 t against 2,497 t in Namibia, a difference of 233 t.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.

Eritrea ranks 155th and Namibia ranks 157th of 201 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 2,614 t 1,448 t 1,166 t Eritrea
2000s 2,430 t 1,978 t 451.99 t Eritrea
2010s 2,673 t 2,235 t 437.92 t Eritrea
2020s 2,725 t 2,586 t 139.64 t Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Eritrea or Namibia?
Eritrea, at 2,730 t against 2,497 t in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Eritrea and Namibia?
233 t, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Namibia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Namibia rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
Eritrea ranks 155th and Namibia ranks 157th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).