Eritrea vs Polynesia: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Eritrea
- Polynesia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 2,730 t against 2,660 t in Polynesia, a difference of 70 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Polynesia ahead.
Eritrea ranks 155th and Polynesia ranks 156th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Polynesia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,614 t | 3,135 t | 521.42 t | Polynesia |
| 2000s | 2,430 t | 3,310 t | 879.97 t | Polynesia |
| 2010s | 2,673 t | 3,128 t | 455.18 t | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 2,725 t | 2,651 t | 74.14 t | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Eritrea or Polynesia?
- Eritrea, at 2,730 t against 2,660 t in Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Eritrea and Polynesia?
- 70 t, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Polynesia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Polynesia rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Eritrea ranks 155th and Polynesia ranks 156th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).