Eritrea vs Puerto Rico: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Eritrea
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 2,866 t against 2,730 t in Eritrea, a difference of 136 t.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Eritrea ranks 155th and Puerto Rico ranks 153rd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 3 and Puerto Rico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,614 t | 2,240 t | 373.58 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 2,430 t | 2,295 t | 135.56 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 2,673 t | 2,655 t | 17.58 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 2,725 t | 2,808 t | 82.76 t | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Eritrea or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 2,866 t against 2,730 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Eritrea and Puerto Rico?
- 136 t, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Puerto Rico?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Puerto Rico rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Eritrea ranks 155th and Puerto Rico ranks 153rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).