Eritrea vs Vanuatu: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Eritrea
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Vanuatu currently reports 3,553 t against 2,730 t in Eritrea, a difference of 823 t.
That makes Vanuatu's figure about 1.3 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Vanuatu ahead.
Eritrea ranks 155th and Vanuatu ranks 152nd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Vanuatu in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,614 t | 2,103 t | 510.61 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 2,430 t | 1,833 t | 597.09 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 2,673 t | 2,777 t | 104.07 t | Vanuatu |
| 2020s | 2,725 t | 3,087 t | 361.64 t | Vanuatu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Eritrea or Vanuatu?
- Vanuatu, at 3,553 t against 2,730 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Eritrea and Vanuatu?
- 823 t, with Vanuatu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Vanuatu?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Vanuatu rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Eritrea ranks 155th and Vanuatu ranks 152nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).