Ethiopia PDR vs Melanesia: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Melanesia
How they compare
Melanesia currently reports 64,114 t against 61,186 t in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 2,928 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 80th and Melanesia ranks 77th of 201 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Melanesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 45,908 t | 21,855 t | 24,053 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 51,845 t | 26,573 t | 25,272 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 62,798 t | 34,236 t | 28,562 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 66,260 t | 36,604 t | 29,655 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Ethiopia PDR or Melanesia?
- Melanesia, at 64,114 t against 61,186 t in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Ethiopia PDR and Melanesia?
- 2,928 t, with Melanesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Melanesia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Melanesia rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 80th and Melanesia ranks 77th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).