Ethiopia vs Middle Africa: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Ethiopia
- Middle Africa
How they compare
Middle Africa currently reports 580,800 t against 269,982 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 310,818 t.
That makes Middle Africa's figure about 2.2 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Middle Africa has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 28th and Middle Africa ranks 26th of 201 countries.
Middle Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Middle Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 69,582 t | 233,929 t | 164,347 t | Middle Africa |
| 2000s | 112,922 t | 275,981 t | 163,059 t | Middle Africa |
| 2010s | 222,662 t | 483,080 t | 260,418 t | Middle Africa |
| 2020s | 264,383 t | 564,116 t | 299,734 t | Middle Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Ethiopia or Middle Africa?
- Middle Africa, at 580,800 t against 269,982 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Ethiopia and Middle Africa?
- 310,818 t, with Middle Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Middle Africa?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Middle Africa rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Ethiopia ranks 28th and Middle Africa ranks 26th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).