Ethiopia vs Myanmar: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Ethiopia
- Myanmar
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 269,982 t against 243,084 t in Myanmar, a difference of 26,898 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Myanmar ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 28th and Myanmar ranks 31st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 69,582 t | 113,480 t | 43,898 t | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 112,922 t | 209,484 t | 96,561 t | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 222,662 t | 264,430 t | 41,768 t | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 264,383 t | 244,738 t | 19,645 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Ethiopia or Myanmar?
- Ethiopia, at 269,982 t against 243,084 t in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Ethiopia and Myanmar?
- 26,898 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Myanmar?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Myanmar rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Ethiopia ranks 28th and Myanmar ranks 31st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).