Ethiopia vs Poland: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Ethiopia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 329,474 t against 269,982 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 59,492 t.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 28th and Poland ranks 26th of 201 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 69,582 t | 356,341 t | 286,759 t | Poland |
| 2000s | 112,922 t | 290,539 t | 177,617 t | Poland |
| 2010s | 222,662 t | 284,546 t | 61,884 t | Poland |
| 2020s | 264,383 t | 324,758 t | 60,375 t | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Ethiopia or Poland?
- Poland, at 329,474 t against 269,982 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Ethiopia and Poland?
- 59,492 t, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Poland?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Poland rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Ethiopia ranks 28th and Poland ranks 26th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).