Finland vs Kyrgyz Republic: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Finland
- Kyrgyz Republic
How they compare
Kyrgyz Republic currently reports 26,249 t against 21,609 t in Finland, a difference of 4,640 t.
That makes Kyrgyz Republic's figure about 1.2 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 104th and Kyrgyz Republic ranks 100th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyz Republic in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Kyrgyz Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26,607 t | 16,313 t | 10,294 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 29,319 t | 24,238 t | 5,082 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 25,254 t | 25,519 t | 264.47 t | Kyrgyz Republic |
| 2020s | 22,719 t | 26,267 t | 3,548 t | Kyrgyz Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Finland or Kyrgyz Republic?
- Kyrgyz Republic, at 26,249 t against 21,609 t in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Finland and Kyrgyz Republic?
- 4,640 t, with Kyrgyz Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Kyrgyz Republic?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Kyrgyz Republic rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Finland ranks 104th and Kyrgyz Republic ranks 100th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).