Finland vs Sierra Leone: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Finland
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Finland currently reports 21,609 t against 19,439 t in Sierra Leone, a difference of 2,170 t.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 116th and Sierra Leone ranks 118th of 201 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 18,014 t | 4,393 t | 13,621 t | Finland |
| 1970s | 23,231 t | 5,022 t | 18,209 t | Finland |
| 1980s | 25,430 t | 6,013 t | 19,417 t | Finland |
| 1990s | 27,259 t | 6,403 t | 20,855 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 29,319 t | 11,066 t | 18,253 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 25,254 t | 18,783 t | 6,471 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 22,719 t | 19,309 t | 3,410 t | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Finland or Sierra Leone?
- Finland, at 21,609 t against 19,439 t in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Finland and Sierra Leone?
- 2,170 t, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Sierra Leone?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Sierra Leone rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Finland ranks 116th and Sierra Leone ranks 118th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).