Gabon vs Liberia: Outputs — Cropland potassium

Gabon
7,792 t
in 2023
Liberia
7,490 t
in 2023
Gabon rank
138th
Liberia rank
140th

Outputs — Cropland potassium over time

  • Gabon
  • Liberia
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 7,792 t against 7,490 t in Liberia, a difference of 302 t.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Liberia ahead.

Gabon ranks 138th and Liberia ranks 140th of 201 countries.

Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gabon Liberia Difference Ahead
1960s 1,399 t 3,085 t 1,686 t Liberia
1970s 1,853 t 4,017 t 2,164 t Liberia
1980s 2,714 t 4,622 t 1,908 t Liberia
1990s 3,316 t 3,875 t 558.42 t Liberia
2000s 3,980 t 5,561 t 1,581 t Liberia
2010s 5,375 t 6,634 t 1,259 t Liberia
2020s 7,166 t 7,456 t 289.65 t Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Gabon or Liberia?
Gabon, at 7,792 t against 7,490 t in Liberia as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Gabon and Liberia?
302 t, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Liberia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Gabon and Liberia rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
Gabon ranks 138th and Liberia ranks 140th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).