Georgia vs Norway: Outputs — Cropland potassium
Outputs — Cropland potassium over time
- Georgia
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 6,612 t against 5,443 t in Georgia, a difference of 1,169 t.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Norway ahead.
Georgia ranks 145th and Norway ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,552 t | 9,587 t | 35.28 t | Norway |
| 2000s | 7,447 t | 9,249 t | 1,802 t | Norway |
| 2010s | 5,294 t | 8,509 t | 3,215 t | Norway |
| 2020s | 5,903 t | 8,736 t | 2,833 t | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium, Georgia or Norway?
- Norway, at 6,612 t against 5,443 t in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium between Georgia and Norway?
- 1,169 t, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Norway?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Norway rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium?
- Georgia ranks 145th and Norway ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).